The CEO of the nonprofit managing the Alamo resigned after a powerful Republican state official criticized her publicly, suggesting that her views aren’t compatible with the history of the Texas shrine.
Kate Rogers stated that she had resigned after Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick urged the Alamo Trust’s Board of Directors in a letter to remove her from her position, criticizing her for an academic paper that questioned the state’s education policies and suggested a broader interpretation of the historic site.
Rogers expressed mixed emotions about her decision, citing the recent political events as a clear indication that it was time for her to move on.
Patrick labeled her paper as 'shocking,' asserting that it undermined the traditional narrative of the Alamo, which he referred to as '13 Days of Glory.' His post on social media drew significant attention to the ongoing issues of how history is portrayed in American education.
Patrick's criticism of Rogers aligns with broader political movements attempting to shape historical narratives, often favorable to conservative ideologies. Such tensions have also been evident in the discussions surrounding the teaching of race and slavery in US history.
In her paper, Rogers noted the conservative agendas influencing recent laws in Texas and advocated for the idea that politicians should not dictate educational content. She criticized traditional narratives that obscure the role of slavery in the Texas struggle for independence.
Her desire to create a more inclusive historical narrative reflects ongoing debates within the state, especially amidst significant funding for renovations of the Alamo to further attract tourism.
As the Alamo continues to draw millions of visitors each year aiming to commemorate Texas Liberty, the conflict over its historical representation looks set to provoke further debate in the future.
